Skip to main content
SEO for AI AgentsSEO for AI Agents
Free Schema Checker

A schema checker built for LLM extraction, not just rich results.

Google's free Structured Data Testing Tool was deprecated years ago. The Rich Results Test only checks types Google grants rich results to - a strict subset of what matters in 2026. We validate all Schema.org types, grade sameAs entity links to Wikidata/LinkedIn/Crunchbase, and score schema for LLM ingestion. Free, no signup.

https://

No signup · Crawls up to 50 pages · 60-90 seconds · Free

What we validate

4.8×
Higher LLM selection probability for pages with 15+ Knowledge Graph entities.
Entity-density audits, 2025
60%+
Of audited sites ship zero Organization schema with sameAs edges.
Internal audit corpus, May 2026
0
Schema types Google grants rich results to for many LLM-friendly types (TechArticle, Course, Dataset).
Google structured-data policies

Why schema for LLM extraction is different

Google grants rich results to a curated list of types. LLMs read every type in your JSON-LD as evidence about the entities on the page. That means schema you write only for "rich results" misses the opportunity to bind your content to the entity graph LLMs use to disambiguate brands, products and authors. Two pages with identical content, where one has Person + Organization schema with sameAs edges and the other has none, get cited at very different rates in AI answers.

Rich-results-only schema
LLM-extraction-ready schema
Goal
Win a SERP feature on Google
Goal
Bind page to the entity graph LLMs query
Required props
Whatever Google's rich-results spec lists
Required props
name, url, sameAs, founder, knowsAbout, etc.
sameAs edges
Optional, often skipped
sameAs edges
Wikidata + LinkedIn + Crunchbase at minimum
Author signals
Plain author string
Author signals
Person @type with credentials + sameAs
Do thisA schema block that wins on both surfaces
application/ld+json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Article",
  "headline": "How AI Overviews choose citations",
  "datePublished": "2026-05-01",
  "dateModified": "2026-05-15",
  "author": {
    "@type": "Person",
    "name": "Jane Doe",
    "jobTitle": "Head of SEO Research",
    "knowsAbout": ["GEO", "AIO", "Structured Data"],
    "sameAs": ["https://www.linkedin.com/in/janedoe"]
  },
  "publisher": {
    "@type": "Organization",
    "name": "Acme",
    "sameAs": ["https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q123"]
  }
}
Earns Article rich results AND binds the byline to a real Person entity LLMs can reason about.

What we won't tell you to do

We won't recommend "speakable" schema for general content (it's specifically scoped to news), or stuff schema with fake aggregateRating (Google penalizes that), or add Review schema without real reviews. Invalid or spammy schema is worse than no schema. Findings include the fix and the rationale.

The 6-point schema checklist

  1. Validate every JSON-LD block at parse time — orphan nodes kill the whole graph.
  2. Ship Organization with logo, url, and 3+ sameAs edges.
  3. Wrap every byline in Person with credentials and a LinkedIn sameAs.
  4. Add Article with datePublished AND dateModified on every long-form page.
  5. Use BreadcrumbList on category and product pages.
  6. Never invent ratings, reviews, or events you don't have.

Run the audit. See your gaps in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup, every finding shows the evidence and a fix you can ship today.

https://
References
  1. [1]Schema.org, full type hierarchy. schema.org
  2. [2]Google Search Central, structured data documentation. developers.google.com
  3. [3]Google Rich Results Test. search.google.com