Skip to main content
SEO for AI AgentsSEO for AI Agents
Core Web Vitals Checker

Free LCP, INP and CLS audit. With the exact fixes.

INP replaced FID as the third Core Web Vital on March 12, 2024 [1]. Most free CWV checkers still grade FID. We grade INP correctly, on both lab data and CrUX field data, and tell you exactly which scripts or interaction handlers are blowing your budget.

https://

No signup · Crawls up to 50 pages · 60-90 seconds · Free

What we measure

200ms
INP budget for a 'Good' rating. Above 500ms the page feels broken.
web.dev INP reference, 2024
2.5s
LCP budget at the 75th percentile of real users on mobile.
Google Core Web Vitals thresholds
58%
CTR loss at position #1 when an AI Overview is present — CWV alone won't save you.
Ahrefs, December 2025
Legacy CWV checker (2020)
2026 CWV checker
Third metric
FID — retired by Google in March 2024.
Third metric
INP — measures every interaction's response, not just the first.
Data source
Lab only (Lighthouse synthetic).
Data source
Lab + Chrome UX Report field data, labelled clearly.
Output
Color-coded score with a generic 'optimise images' tip.
Output
Exact URL, byte size, recommended format, engineer-ready fix.
Ranking framing
'Improve CWV to rank higher'.
Ranking framing
CWV is a tiebreaker. Optimise it for conversion; ranking is a bonus.

Lab data and field data, side by side

Lab data (Lighthouse-style synthetic) is fast and reproducible but doesn't reflect real users. Field data (Chrome UX Report) reflects real users but is delayed and only available for sites with enough traffic. We show both, label which is which, and explain when to trust each.

The fix list

For each failing metric we list the offending resources: which image is bloating LCP, which third-party script is blocking INP, which font swap is causing CLS. Findings ship with the exact URL, the byte size, the recommended format, and a one-line engineering remediation.

How CWV relates to ranking

Google has confirmed CWV is a ranking signal, but a small one - tiebreaker territory. The bigger payoff is conversion: every 100ms shaved off LCP correlates with measurable conversion lift in published ecommerce studies. Optimize CWV for users; ranking improvement is a bonus.

Common fixes we surface

Do thisThe two lines that fix most LCP regressions
html
<link rel="preload" as="image" href="/hero.avif" fetchpriority="high" />
<img src="/hero.avif" width="1280" height="720" alt="…" decoding="async" />
Preload the LCP image, set explicit dimensions to eliminate CLS, and use a modern format.

The 5-point CWV checklist

  1. Stop measuring FID. Confirm your monitoring uses INP.
  2. Identify the LCP element on every template — image, headline, hero card.
  3. Audit every third-party script for INP cost; defer or replace the worst offender.
  4. Reserve space for every async-loaded element: ads, embeds, late-rendered cards.
  5. Re-test on field data after each ship; lab data lies about real-user conditions.

Run the audit. See your gaps in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup, every finding shows the evidence and a fix you can ship today.

https://
References
  1. [1]Google, Core Web Vitals: INP replaces FID, March 12 2024. web.dev
  2. [2]Web.dev, LCP, INP and CLS reference. web.dev
  3. [3]Chrome UX Report (CrUX) documentation. developer.chrome.com
  4. [4]Google Search Central, Core Web Vitals in Search ranking. developers.google.com